雷竞技app官方版下载ios-雷竞技官方平台
doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402311
1.
中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580
2.
中国石化 勘探分公司, 成都 610041
详细信息
中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580
中国石化 勘探分公司, 成都 610041
Genetic mechanism of dolomite in third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
1.
School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
2.
SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
雷竞技官方平台:
白云岩是四川盆地海相层系最为重要的天然气储层类型之一，也是深层碳酸盐岩油气勘探的重点，白云岩成因机理的研究是预测深层优质白云岩储层分布的基础。通过川东南地区茅口组三段白云岩露头、岩心、薄片等资料，结合碳氧同位素、锶同位素、稀土元素等研究了白云岩的成因机理。川东南地区茅三段白云岩可分为层状粉晶白云岩、层状细—中晶白云岩以及鞍形白云石胶结物。层状细—中晶白云岩是最主要的白云岩类型，未受热液影响的该类型白云岩δ18OVPDB值为-7.04‰~-6.08‰，与泥晶灰岩相似，87Sr/86Sr比值为0.707 550~0.707 740，处于同期海水范围值内，主要成因为准同生—埋藏期封闭局限海水渗透回流白云岩化；受到热液影响的该类型白云岩δ18OVPDB值为-7.33‰~-7.11‰，与泥晶灰岩相比略微偏负，87Sr/86Sr比值为0.707 950~0.708 171，高于同期海水。层状粉晶白云岩未明显受到热液影响改造，其成因与上述未受热液影响的层状细—中晶白云岩一致。而溶洞、裂缝中的鞍形白云石胶结物则是热液流体直接沉淀或重结晶所形成，具有较高的87Sr/86Sr比值(均值0.707 970)、明显偏负的δ18OVPDB值(均值-7.32‰)以及Eu的正异常。从层状粉晶白云岩、层状细—中晶白云岩到鞍形白云石胶结物，呈现出一种受控于封闭局限海水到热液流体的梯度性变化，研究区内的白云岩是由多期次流体、多次成岩作用的结果。
Abstract:
Dolomite formation is a crucial aspect of natural gas reservoirs in the marine strata of the Sichuan Basin, particularly in the exploration of deep carbonate reserved oil and gas resources. Understanding the genetic mechanism of dolomite is essential for predicting the distribution of favorable dolomite reservoirs in deep formations. Taking the third member of the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin as an example, present work systematically investigates the genetic mechanism of dolomite by analyzing geochemical characteristics such as carbon and oxygen isotopes, strontium isotopes and rare earth elements. The analysis is based on data from outcrops, core samples and thin sections. The results reveal that the dolomites of the third member of the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin can be categorized into laminated fine-crystalline dolomite, laminated fine to medium-crystalline dolomite, and saddle dolomite cement. Among these, the laminated fine to medium-crystalline dolomite is the most common type. The δ18O values of this dolomite type (-7.04‰ to -6.08‰) appeared unaffected by hydrothermal fluids, and are similar to those of mud-crystal limestone. Additionally, the 87Sr/86Sr ratio (0.707 550 to 0.707 740) locate within the range of contemporaneous seawater, indicating a diagenesis process of quasi-syngenetic to burial-induced restricted marine water infiltration dolomitization. The δ18O values of hydrothermally influenced dolomite range from -7.33‰ to -7.11‰, showing slightly negative compared to those of mud-crystal limestone. These dolomites also showed relatively higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.707 950 to 0.708 171) than those of contemporaneous seawater. The laminated fine-crystalline dolomite, which was not affected by hydrothermal fluids, shares a common genetic mechanism with the previously mentioned laminated fine to medium-crystalline dolomite. Saddle dolomite cement found in caves and fractures is either directly precipitated or recrystallized from hydrothermal fluids. This type of dolomite is characterized by higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios (with a mean value of 0.707 970), significantly negative δ18O values (with a mean value of -7.32‰), and positive Eu anomalies. A gradient change from laminated fine-crystalline dolomite to laminated fine to medium-crystalline dolomite and finally to saddle dolomite cement is observed, controlled by a transition from marine water to hydrothermal fluids. The dolomite in the study area is proposed to be the product of multi-stage fluid-induced diagenesis.
Key words:
geochemical characteristics /
genetic mechanism /
dolomite /
Maokou Formation /
Middle Permian /
Sichuan Basin
图 1 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段沉积相与岩性柱状图
Figure 1. Sedimentary facies and lithological column of third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
下载:
图 2 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段白云岩分布对比
Figure 2. Distribution comparison of dolomite in third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 3 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段白云岩宏观特征
a.深灰色泥晶灰岩与灰色粉晶白云岩成层状沉积，分界明显，泰来601井，茅三段；b.层状白云岩，可见明显残余生物碎屑，同时发育硅质条带、方解石条带，放牛坝剖面，茅三段；c.层状白云岩，见斑马状构造，裂缝和溶洞中发育鞍形白云石、方解石和石英胶结物，放牛坝剖面，茅三段；d.层状细—中晶白云岩，偶见生物碎屑残留，泰来6井，茅三段；e.层状细—中晶白云岩，可见大量残余生物碎屑，黄线内部为鞍形白云石胶结物，红线到黄线内部为受热液影响的白云岩，其余部分为未受热液影响的白云岩，泰来7井，茅三段；f.细—中晶白云岩，裂缝、溶洞中充填大量鞍形白云石，泰来7井，茅三段。
Figure 3. Macroscopic characteristics of dolomite from third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 4 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段白云岩微观特征
a.粉晶白云岩，孔隙几乎不发育，偶见残余生物碎屑，泰来601井，茅三段；b.粉晶白云岩，泰来601井，茅三段；c.b所对应的阴极发光照片，白云石发暗红色光，泥质不发光；d.细—中晶白云岩，部分晶体表明污浊，呈自形—半自形晶，可见颗粒幻影，泰来6井，茅三段；e.细—中晶白云岩，晶体呈自形，可见颗粒幻影，放牛坝剖面，茅三段；f.e所对应的阴极发光照片，白云石晶体呈现出两种发光的特点；g.细—中晶白云岩，晶间孔发育，原始结构保存较好，放牛坝剖面，茅三段；h.左侧为溶洞内充填鞍形白云石胶结物，晶体呈粗晶状，右侧为受热液影响的细晶白云岩，泰来6井，茅三段；i.h所对应的阴极发光照片，鞍形白云石发亮红色光，右侧细晶白云岩受热液影响重结晶后也发亮红色光。
Figure 4. Microscopic characteristics of dolomite from third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 5 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段碳酸盐岩碳氧同位素特征
Figure 5. Characteristics of δ13CVPDB and δ18OVPDB of carbonate samples from third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 6 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段碳酸盐岩87Sr/86Sr特征
Figure 6. Characteristics of 87Sr/86Sr of carbonate samples from third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 7 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组三段碳酸盐岩稀土元素配分模式
Figure 7. REE characteristics of carbonate samples from third member of Maokou Formation in Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin
[1]
WARREN J. Dolomite: occurrence, evolution and economically important associations[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2000, 52(1/3): 1-81.
[2]
DAVIES G R, SMITH L B. Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: an overview[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(11): 1641-1690. doi: 10.1306/05220605164
[3]
马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 四川盆地大中型天然气田分布特征与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 347-354. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201003000.htmMA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Distribution and further exploration of the large-medium sized gas fields in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(3): 347-354. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201003000.htm
[4]
胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地东部地区中二叠统茅口组白云岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htmHU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Maokou dolomite reservoirs in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htm
[5]
陈宗清. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2007, 12(5): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200705002.htmCHEN Zongqing. Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2007, 12(5): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200705002.htm
[6]
李大军, 陈辉, 陈洪德, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(5): 756-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201605016.htmLI Dajun, CHEN Hui, CHEN Hongde, et al. Relationship between reservoir development in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation and paleostructure evolution in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(5): 756-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201605016.htm
[7]
陈宗清. 论四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3): 325-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200903006.htmCHEN Zongqing. Discussion on gas exploration of Middle Permian Qixia Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3): 325-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200903006.htm
[8]
韩月卿, 张军涛, 何治亮, 等. 川西中二叠统栖霞组白云岩特征与成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(1): 75-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202301006.htmHAN Yueqing, ZHANG Juntao, HE Zhiliang, et al. Characteristics and genesis of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation dolostone in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 75-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202301006.htm
[9]
沈安江, 罗宪婴, 胡安平, 等. 从准同生到埋藏环境的白云石化路径及其成储效应[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4): 637-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202204002.htmSHEN Anjiang, LUO Xianying, HU Anping, et al. Dolomitization evolution and its effects on hydrocarbon reservoir formation from penecontemporaneous to deep burial environment[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4): 637-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202204002.htm
[10]
邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地震旦系-寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 278-293. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201403006.htmZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 278-293. . https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201403006.htm
[11]
魏国齐, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系—寒武系大型气藏特征与聚集模式[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201501001.htmWEI Guoqi, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Characteristics and accumulation modes of large gas reservoirs in Sinian-Cambrian of Gaoshiti-Moxi region, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201501001.htm
[12]
张荫本. 四川盆地二迭系中的白云岩化[J]. 石油学报, 1982, 3(1): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB198201006.htmZHANG Yinben. Dolomitization in Permian rocks in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1982, 3(1): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB198201006.htm
[13]
宋文海. 四川盆地二叠系白云岩的分布及天然气勘探[J]. 天然气工业, 1985, 5(4): 22-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG198504005.htmSONG Wenhai. Distribution of Permian dolomite and natural gas exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1985, 5(4): 22-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG198504005.htm
[14]
何幼斌, 冯增昭. 四川盆地及其周缘下二叠统细—粗晶自云岩成因探讨[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 1996, 18(4): 15-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX604.002.htmHE Youbin, FENG Zengzhao. Origin of fine- to coarse-grained dolostones of Lower Permian in Sichuan Basin and its peripheral regions[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 1996, 18(4): 15-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX604.002.htm
[15]
金振奎, 冯增昭. 滇东—川西下二叠统白云岩的形成机理: 玄武岩淋滤白云化[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(3): 383-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199903007.htmJIN Zhenkui, FENG Zengzhao. Origin of dolostones of the Lower Permian in East Yunnan-West Sichuan: dolomitization through leaching of basalts[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(3): 383-389. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199903007.htm
[16]
刘建强, 郑浩夫, 刘波, 等. 川中地区中二叠统茅口组白云岩特征及成因机理[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 386-398. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201704003.htmLIU Jianqiang, ZHENG Haofu, LIU Bo, et al. Characteristics and genetic mechanism of the dolomite in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, central Sichuan area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(4): 386-398. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201704003.htm
[17]
胡安平, 潘立银, 郝毅, 等. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2018, 23(2): 39-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201802006.htmHU Anping, PAN Liyin, HAO Yi, et al. Origin, characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2018, 23(2): 39-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201802006.htm
[18]
黎霆, 诸丹诚, 李海平, 等. 中二叠统茅口组白云岩发育机理: 以川中—川东地区为例[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(2): 345-355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202002015.htmLI Ting, ZHU Dancheng, LI Haiping, et al. Genetic mechanism of dolomite in Middle Permian Maokou Formation: case study of central and eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(2): 345-355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202002015.htm
[19]
李毅, 沈浩, 石学文, 等. 川东—川中地区茅口组白云岩成因初探及"热次盆"概念的提出[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2013, 36(4): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201304002.htmLI Yi, SHEN Hao, SHI Xuewen, et al. Distribution and origin of dolomites in Maokou Formation, eastern and central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2013, 36(4): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201304002.htm
[20]
汪华, 沈浩, 黄东, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统热水白云岩成因及其分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(9): 25-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201409006.htmWANG Hua, SHEN Hao, HUANG Dong, et al. Origin and distribution of hydrothermal dolomites of the Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(9): 25-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201409006.htm
[21]
赵宗举, 周慧, 陈轩, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪层序岩相古地理及有利勘探区带[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S2): 35-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2012S2003.htmZHAO Zongju, ZHOU Hui, CHEN Xuan, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and favorable exploration zones of the Permian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(S2): 35-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2012S2003.htm
[22]
张运波. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层及沉积模式[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2011.ZHANG Yunbo. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional models of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2011.
[23]
何斌, 徐义刚, 王雅玫, 等. 东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htmHE Bin, XU Yigang, WANG Yamei, et al. Nature of the Dongwu movement and its temporal and spatial evolution[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htm
[24]
王运生, 金以钟. 四川盆地下二叠统白云岩及古岩溶的形成与峨眉地裂运动的关系[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 1997, 24(1): 8-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG701.003.htmWANG Yunsheng, JIN Yizhong. The formation of dolomite and paleokarst of the Lower Permian series in Sichuan Basin and the relation to the Emei taphrogenesis[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 1997, 24(1): 8-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG701.003.htm
[25]
宋鸿彪, 罗志立. 四川盆地基底及深部地质结构研究的进展[J]. 地学前缘, 1995, 2(3/4): 231-237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY504.018.htmSONG Hongbiao, LUO Zhili. The study of the basement and deep geological structures of Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1995, 2(3/4): 231-237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY504.018.htm
[26]
VEIZER J, ALA D, AZMY K, et al. 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999, 161(1/3): 59-88.
[27]
DRAVIS J J, WANLESS H R. Reflux dolomitization: a Holocene example beneath a coastal salina, West Caicos Island, Turks and Caicos Islands[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 97: 311-322.
[28]
LAND L S. The isotopic and trace element geochemistry of dolomite: the state of the art[M]//ZENGER D H, DUNHAM J B, ETHINGTON R L. Concepts and models of dolomitization. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publication, 1980.
[29]
VAHRENKAMP V C, SWART P K. New distribution coefficient for the incorporation of strontium into dolomite and its implications for the formation of ancient dolomites[J]. Geology, 1990, 18(5): 387-391.
点击查看大图
图(8)
苏公网安备32021102000780号